The case of the disappearing Airbus

Scooby doo, where are you? We have to solve the case of the disappearing Airbus! As I have blogged about recently, the INC has been accused of owning an airbus for the sole use of the INC elite. There was quite a bit of evidence of this on the internet for months before the Airbus was suddenly reported as being on sale. Now, months after the airbus supposedly went on sale, the INC comes out saying there is no airbus, never has been.

What exactly is going on here?

Did it take the INC months and months to figure out they didn't have an airbus?

This writer highly doubts it. This all reeks highly of cover up.

Prove it, says the INC. With this statement and challenge, there is almost no doubt that the INC no longer owns an airbus at this time. That does NOT mean that they never did. They are simply sweeping things under the rug, the best they can, before any of this comes to a legal forum.

Understand that obtianing PROOF may, in fact be impossible at this time without court order due to the INC's influence and wealth-borne power.

Brokers in the sale of the airbus may have been forced to sign waivers of non-disclosure and/or been paid off to keep quiet. People in the know within the INC are either in the inner circle and bound to remain quiet or are hired guns (so to speak) who cannot speak up for fear of their masters.

The bottom line is this. Examine the evidence. Come to your own conclusions. There are very good articles and evidence in many different parts of the internet to look at.

Without resorting to copy and paste overload, here are some places to start.

Rappler.com has a good article about the airbus, and includes some discussion about its attempted sale.

Iglesianiquitso.freeforums.org has a discussion thread and photographic evidence showing the interior of the airbus, in addition to flight tracking details and discussions about its sale.

Sher Lock's facebook page just recently posted a travel log of the very airbus purportedly owned by the INC alongside EVM travel dates that match up beyond the possibility of coincidence.

Then of course, there is the evidence straight from the horse's mouth. The reasoning given by EVM for the stories about his airbus include "a fear of flying," and a rhetorical question as to "how am I supposed to visit" the brethren abroad? "Walk?" He also quotes quasi-scientific fears of vortexes or some such nonsense to try and gain the sympathy of his followers.

There is a large pool of evidence about the airbus other than the above sources, but I will leave the rest of the discovery work to you, Scooby Doo. After all, the benefit obtained if one is given a fish is nothing compared to learning to fish for yourself.

So is there "proof" that the INC currently owns an airbus? None that I know of. Is there overwhelming evidence that the INC did own an airbus when it caused the enormous controversy that it did a few months back? Absolutely.

But, be your own judge. Review the evidence. Decide for yourself. Resist the temptation to believe the first thing out of Edwil Zabala's mouth. After all, he is the top minion of the INC elite and cannot be expected to speak truth, but only words that exalt his masters.

Thank you for your attention. As always, I welcome your feedback!